Mystery of the Stone Mounds
The appearance of literally thousands of small stone mounds, cairns, and even one large serpent effigy in the central Ohio Valley and mid-Appalachian highlands region has generally baffled professional archeologists, hunters, hikers, and others who continually encounter these enigmatic remains. To date, little systematic research or scientific study beyond mere speculation has been associated with these obviously prehistoric remains. However, anyone who has walked the ridgetops of the central Ohio Valley area, particularly in Ohio, Ky., or WV is familiar with these stone structures. Others of these remains have also been noted by this author and others in upland areas of eastern VA, in Tenn. and other places as well, and they appear to be a fairly widespread Woodlands era cultural feature. There is even some possibility that early stone mound construction may have been begun in upland areas well beyond this time frame back into the Archaic period or earlier.
APPEARANCE AND LOCATIONS OF THE STONE MOUNDS
The thousands of piles of stones which make up this as yet unidentified cultural phenomenon are generally characterized by their small size and appearance in groups of various sizes from 2 or 3 to 30 or more in one location. Seldom taller than head high, these stone mounds appear circular mainly and are made up of small, local stones no bigger than an individual might reasonably carry. However, in some cases, particularly the stone serpent that will be discussed below, actual quarrying activities can be detected in the immediate vicinity, indicating, perhaps, that these sites were not randomly selected. While most of the smaller mound groupings are found mainly on the ridgetop trails, the larger assemblages seem to occur on wider benches or more exposed areas at lower elevations. These groupings do not seem to follow any larger geometric patterns (circles, for example), and their purposes are as yet undetermined. For some time, it was suggested that these represented early pioneer farmers attempts to clear cultivation spaces; but these cairns--as they are often called--are not usually found in areas of known cultivation on the many small farms in the regions where they have been observed or when local farmers are consulted.
PURPOSES OF THE STONE MOUNDS
Much speculation has centered on why these mounds were built, regardless of by whom or when. Here are some: Burials: To date the small stone mounds that have been excavated, including several many years ago by this author, gave no indication of human remains or any other cultural contents aside from the occasional random digging tool of local stone origins. While this may be a possibility worth further exploration for those complexes of several cairns at the lower elevations mentioned above, it seems highly unlikely that the majority were ever built to contain or hide something inside.
Trail Markers: Much speculation has been advanced by interested hikers in WV, where the only systematic recording of these mounds was made forty years ago by a local amateur archeologist named Lanny Brisbin of Huntington. Mr. Brisbin held that most of these structures marked rigdetop trails along many known early historic and prehistoric pathways throughout the rugged highland areas. Frequently these were near known watercourse trails as well. While this idea may well be true, it does not account for the many larger groupings at lower elevations and on flatter surfaces with good visibility or on more isolated benches below ridgetops.
Other Markers: While doing archeolgical survey in the same region in the 1970's and 80's this author frequently encountered or was called to investigate these structures. My own general speculation concerning small groupings of 2-4 mounds on ridgetop trails was that they indicated (at times even pointed to) nearby, unseen features of importance. These included mainly water (springs, seasonal pools) or a rock shelter presence below the trail. Time and again I tested this hypothesis with some success, although it did not account for all such groupings where trails did not otherwise intersect or diverge.
Ceremonial Complexes: In a recent article on these stone mounds (Charleston, WV, Gazette, Sunday, Nov. 15, 09), archeolgist Roger Wise speculated that the larger groupings may indicate some ceremonial use. There may be some validity to this speculation, based upon viewing them as celestial calculators or markers of some sort. Wise's article also included images of some of his recent mound visits for those interested in viewing the stone mounds. Obviously, short of detailed excavations and surveys, any such ideas might be difficult to verify.
STONE SERPENT MOUND OF KENTUCKY
In the 1960's L. Brisbin discovered and identified the great stone serpent mound on a ridgetop above the Big Sandy River, not far from the Ohio R. near Catlettsburg Ky. The Big Sandy marks the border between Ky. and WV. there. It took Brisbin some time to get the ground cleared and to map the actual stone structure, and even more time before professionals took a look at it and recognized it for what it was. Of course, much is known about the Great Serpent Mound of southern Ohio dated to middle Woodland times, but that is an earthen structure. The stone serpent is unique in that it is constructed totally of stone, but winds its way for over 500 feet up one side, across the top and down the other side of a ridge. Nearby are extensive quarrying evidence in the local limestone boulders. Later, surveys indicated that an 'altar' area (pehaps an egg in the serpents mouth similar to the earth one in Ohio) on a bench below the head--which is more that twenty feet across and may have been 12 feet high--had a direct solar alignment with the summer solstice on the opposite ridge across the river. The site is remarkably well preserved and is now protected on lands owned by the Ashland Oil Co. This author has followed the winding path of the serpent body its entire length on more than one occasion until it ends in a single stone. It is a remarkable achievement of prehistory with which few are familiar. The clear solar alignment seems to be a phenomenon of large stoneworks throughout the world during this period and gives credence to further investigations of other stone complexes along these lines.
DATING OF THE STONE STRUCTURES
As Wise pointed out in his recent article, it appears at present that these stone mounds, whatever their purposes, could be dated anytime during the prehistoric period from the end of the ice age to late prehistoric. Many archeologists would tend to put them with the Woodland cultures, based upon the nearness of earth mounds and the similarity of the two known great serpent effigy structures. There is no reason, however, that they could not be ascribed to different time periods and even different functions. My own speculation tends to put the actual tradition of building the small markers on high elevations at an early date when warmer, wetter climates made movements at lower elevations in the regions where they are found difficult. Any time in the post paleo-Indian period is, therefore, not out of the realm of possibility. It is also logical to assume that, once begun, the continuity of prehistoric peoples in any given region could have led to a continuation and refinement or expansion of the purposes for which they were initially constructed. In any event there is certainly room for systematic study of these widespread and unique remains in multiple areas of the eastern U.S.; for anyone who has encountered them has an instinctive feeling that there was something important going on to require such an investment of labor over time--and in such often remote places. To date, the isolation of these structures and the reluctance of small farmers to inquire about the ones on their land have restricted the mounds from competing with more glamorous and visible sites for the diminishing time and dollars of those best equipped to investigate them as thoroughly as they deserve to be.
For more on this author's speculation on the purposes of the stone mounds the reader is encouraged to check out his first novel in the People of the Stone series, THE STONE BREAKERS, where one particular interpretation of these stone mounds makes an important contribution to the main characters' survival in the latter chapters of the book.
To add your own comment or question, please click on Comment and log on to our easy to access and secured website. Your ideas are welcomed and important.
Leave a Comment
Leave a Comment With Your Facebook Account!
Recent Blog Posts
- MEGALITHS AND MINOTAURS: OLD SITES, NEW THINGS TO SEE
- KINGDOMS OF STONE: The Second Book in the Maya Trilogy: Preview and Now Available
- JOHN LLOYD STEPHENS AND FREDERICK CATHERWOOD: A MAYA LEGACY NOT FORGOTTEN
- OF FIRE AND ICE: THE REAL "GAME" THAT CHANGED THE HUMAN PAST
- ORDER AND CHAOS: SAVING THE SUN FROM DEATH DURING A TOTAL ECLIPSE
- NEW FRENCH CAVE DISCOVERIES PUSH ART ORIGINS BACK IN TIME: Importance of the Chauvet Cave in Southern France
- PLACE OF THE MISTY SKY: The legend, the new book by T. C. KUHN, and the story behind this important new novel
- ANNOUNCING NEW MAYA BOOK SERIES: FIRST NOVEL COMING IN SEPTEMBER
- ROADS TO EL MIRADOR: A DESTINATION OF IMPORTANCE FOR TWENTY-FIVE HUNDRED YEARS
- EL MIRADOR: MAN MADE MOUNTAINS THAT TOUCH THE SKY